four billion is a really large number

The whole corporate bailout thing happening in the US and now Australia really pisses me off. So I was glad they published my letter to the editor of the Courier Mail today.

The whole bail out situation smells fishy to me:

“It’s not based on any particular data point, we just wanted to choose a really large number.”

- A Treasury spokeswoman tells Forbes.com on how they came up with US 700 billion dollars as the bail out figure.

I guess that’s how Wayne Swan came up with his four billion dollar figure to “boost competition in the mortgage market”.

Mark Stacey of Sorrento in WA put it really well in today’s Australian newspaper when he said:

It is sad to see the major political parties squabbling to claim ownership over a bad idea, namely the use of taxpayers’ money to increase lending for mortgages. If lending money for house purchases was the route to a propserous and secure future, we’d already be in financial nirvana.

Malcolm Turnbull doesn’t get it. Wayne Swan doesn’t get it either. It’s all rather worrying.

Where else will the Washington Mutual equivalents in Australia get their money?

Update: Banks in Britain are having the same sort of financial problems and other banks there have “… refused to buy mortgage loans that customers are struggling to repay” (link), unlike the Australian Government who is proposing to do just that, with taxpayers’ funds nonetheless.

Update (2 Oct 2008): I sent PM Kevin Rudd a letter and got a standard response saying that they’ll take my opinions on board and send me an official response.

greed, stupidity or suffering?

I was so stoked to see my letter to the editor about this article in the Courier Mail today, along with one from a fellow bubblepedian. I love the headline too.

Update (19/08/2008): I re-read it today and noted that I was quoted at the top of the page as well. Even better!

melissa ketcell: what were you thinking?

It sickened appalled me to read Melissa Ketcell’s article in the Courier Mail today report that speculative property investors are “suffering with rental returns at their lowest in a decade”.

Article by Melissa Ketchell

Article by Melissa Ketchell

How can any journalist compare the suffering of a renter worried about being able to find an affordable home for their family with the supposed suffering of greedy, speculative property investors who are provided with generous Government taxation concessions including negative gearing and capital gains tax exemption?

When an investor buys a Brisbane investment property for the median price of $450,000 they know that the median Brisbane rent is $18,200 and that it will cost them $32,625 in interest per year. But they still do it! You can’t say that they are suffering.

I think some people in the media really need to take a good close look at their behaviour. They’re hardly being responsible or ethical.